Clarifying sports news request

The user is asking for sports news, but I want to clarify what they really want. Should I provide the full top 10 list or just specific details like player stats or game timeframes? I’m considering mentioning qualifiers and historical context, but without a network, I can't guarantee accurate numbers. It’s best to ask the user further about their preferences, such as what specific goals or comparisons they are interested in, like Haaland versus other players.Offering clarification on sports data

I want to offer to pull the latest stats if the user wants them. It's important to keep a friendly tone while suggesting we can visualize the data or provide context on games, as that can vary and affect comparisons. So, I should ask the user what they want next by giving options, like the full list, additional stats, comparisons between notable players, or even exporting data. Additionally, I'll check if they want me to fetch the latest data from Transfermarkt and clarify which World Cup cycle they’re interested in.Deciding on how to answer the user
The user asked for "历史前10," meaning there's no restriction on cycles, which simplifies things. If they prefer a quick answer without citations, I could provide approximations, but I think it might be better to avoid that for accuracy. So, I’ll focus on plain text with minimal formatting and allow for a bullet list to present the information clearly. This way, it's concise and keeps it easy for the user to read.
这是在说“单届世界杯预选赛进球数历史前10”的榜单新闻。需要我补充哪些信息?可以选一项或多项:

是否需要我现查 Transfermarkt 的最新数据并注明来源时间点?如果你已有原始链接,也可以发我,我据此整理与校对。
